The Changing Face of Piracy

MariTrace analyses how the nature of the threat to shipping has changed in recent times.

Much has been made in the media over the last few years of the downwards trend in piracy.  Costs to mitigate against the threat have reduced along with the number of companies available to provide the services required.

It is hard to argue with the facts.  Since its peak in 2010 and 2011, the number of recorded incidents has certainly been on the decline, with figures this year looking to finish nearly 40% down on 2011.  Other than a ‘blip’ in 2015, where the count of incidents was down only about 8% on 2011, this is a steadily growing downwards trend (figure 1, below).

Figure 1: All incidents recorded since Jan 2010.  (Source: MariTrace)

All that said, does this really mean that the threat is decreasing?  A recorded piracy incident is quite vague in its definition.  A sighting of a suspicious vessel is counted in that number, alongside the hijacking of a tanker.

If we look at only incidents where a vessel was approached (or worse), the trend remains quite similar (figure 2).  2011 still has the highest number of incidents, and this year still sits around 40% down on that figure.  A quick glance at the graphs and you might think nothing has changed – in fact not much really has.  The peaks and troughs of the graphs are very similar so this still suggests that the overall threat to world shipping is lower now than it was in 2011.

Figure 2: All incidents except suspicious sightings recorded since Jan 2010.  (Source:  MariTrace)

So where does this leave us?  Well, the graph below (figure 3) shows how kidnapping had changed since 2011 and this starts to paint an interesting picture.

Figure 3:  All kidnappings recorded since Jan 2011 (excludes hijackings where the entire vessel was taken with the crew).  (Source:  MariTrace)

Figure 3 is interesting because it is the only graph which shows an upwards trend since 2011.  In fact, some months in 2015 and 2016 had more kidnappings than recorded in total in 2010 and 2011 combined.  It is worth noting, though, that if you include hijackings then the figure for this year is similar to those of 2010 and 2011.  This seems to show a change in tactics, perhaps.

To have a fuller picture of this, it can be useful to know where these incidents (hijackings and kidnappings) are occurring geographically (figures 4 and 5).

Figure 4: Kidnappings and hijackings from Jan 2010 to Dec 2011.  (Source:  MariTrace)
Figure 5: Kidnappings and hijackings from Jan 2015 to Dec 2016.  (Note: further incidents are noted in the Caribbean Sea, but are excluded in this figure for brevity.)  (Source: MariTrace)

This shows a very interesting geographical change.  The coast of Somalia, the Gulf of Aden, the Arabian Sea, and the western Indian Ocean were extremely active areas in 2010/11, whereas there have now been only three incidents in the last two years.  Does that mean that the areas are safe and mitigations are no longer required, or does it simply mean that the safety processes in place are working?  The answer to this may become clearer as vessel operators start taking the risk of hiring cheaper and less well trained crews and holding off from properly hardening their vessels as they transit these ‘traditionally’ dangerous waters.

In the meantime, the Bay of Bengal around Bangladesh is now dotted with hijackings and kidnappings.  These individual incidents are mostly against fishing vessels with lower ransom demands than when tankers and cargo vessels were being attacked in 2010-2011 but in some ways, this makes them more of a problem as they are unlikely to gain the same worldwide press coverage but they still have the same impact on the persons being kidnapped and their families.

So, what does all this mean?  Is the threat of piracy going away?  Probably not.  But it is certainly changing.  As has been the case for centuries, piracy will always exist while there are social and economic problems in existence which make it a viable way for a person to survive.  Piracy can be mitigated against, showing figures of incidents reducing because pirates are dissuaded from attacking, but this is surely a case of treating the symptom rather than the cause, and once you remove the sticking plaster it is a matter of time before the problems return.

To perform your own analysis of our database of over 6,500 piracy incidents, or perform a risk assessment of your passage – please visit us at and request a free trial of our system.

MariTrace’s Commodity Tracker averaging 98% accuracy…and this data is live

MariTrace’s Commodity Tracker feature has been benchmarked against the official export data from Port Hedland for Iron Ore and has returned some astonishing accuracy.

MariTrace has compared the official export data for Port Hedland, as released by the Pilbara Ports Authority, to MariTrace‘s own Commodity Tracker data.  This study has revealed that MariTrace’s data accuracy is within 98% of the official figures on average over the last 24 months.

In the graph below, the blue line indicates MariTrace’s calculation of the amount of iron-ore exports compared to the official data, shown in red.

Comparing MariTrace’s data to the official statistics

While this accuracy is impressive in itself, MariTrace is generating these numbers as the vessels move out of the berth.  For all intents and purposes, the data is live.

Official monthly numbers for port export data are often released weeks after the month has completed.  In many it’s released many months later and, quite often, it is never released.  Even if port-agents are communicating that data as it comes in, the process is notoriously difficult to automate.  Not only that, but it relies on having a contact inside every port that you want to track.  And a reliable contact at that.

MariTrace gets around this problem by examining the AIS signature of the each vessel.  It compares that data against the proprietary geospatial data that it holds for these ports.   By comparing these two valuable data-sets, MariTrace can not only determine which commodity a vessel is likely to have been loading or discharging at that port, but how much it is loading or discharging.  And, since the AIS data is received live, the calculations are made as the changes occur.  No need to wait, anymore, for official numbers to be released.

This gives an unparalleled glimpse into the worldwide movements of vessels at a macro or micro level.  In many cases, MariTrace can determine how long vessels waited at anchor to get to the berth, and how long they spent at each berth.  The result of this is a detailed insight into vessel behaviour.

Knowing where a vessel has been to pick up a commodity is one thing, but MariTrace can also determine where that vessel went to next.

Port Hedland iron export exports and their eventual destinations
Port Hedland iron export exports and their eventual destinations

For example, the above chart shows where the iron ore exports from Port Hedland have been ending up.  The graph below shows how this has been changing over the last two years.

Port Hedland iron export exports and how the eventual destinations alter over time

This wealth of data isn’t necessarily restricted to a single port, or even a single country.  Users can define their own areas of interest and examine all the activity within that area at a level of detail useful to them.  So, a user can look at that picture as a whole, or examine individual vessel movements and activity within specific berths.

With such a level of accuracy, and at such different scales, MariTrace’s rich seam of proprietary data gives it a solid foundation on which to provide essential intelligence to any industry – whether directly involved in maritime or not.

For more information on MariTrace, click here go to to the website and request a fee trial.